The author critically reviews a randomised controlled trial by homeopathy for chronic headache and an observational follow-up study of the same patient cohort.The results showed no di°erence between homeopathy and placebo. The author believes that theseresultswere a`falsenegative’due toinadequatehomeopathic treatment,particu- larly relating to the duration of symptoms and handling of homeopathic aggravations. Guidelines for future studies are proposed.
Homeopathy (2002) 91, 32–34
& 2002 The Faculty of Homeopathy
DEBATE
Homeopathic treatment of chronic headache: a critique
G Vithoulkas1*
1International Academy for Classical Homeopathy, Alonissos 37005, Greece
The author critically reviews a randomised controlled trial by homeopathy for chronic headache and an observational follow-up study of the same patient cohort. The results showed no di¡erence between homeopathy and placebo. The author believes that these results were a‘false negative’due toinadequate homeopathic treatment, particu- larly relating to the duration of symptoms and handling of homeopathic aggravations. Guidelines for future studies are proposed.
Keywords: headache; randomised controlled trial; observational study; homeopathy; critique; aggravation