Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 6

naire’s Disease; the entire effort has been focused on the microbial cause, and has largely ignored the constitutional susceptibility of the victims. Another perfectly valid approach, which might even produce better results, would be to study the relative resistance of the survivors to the supposedly virulent organism.

Unfortunately, the obsession of medical researchers with their de- termination to pursue this erroneous idea of microbes and concrete causative factors in illness, despite increasingly disappointing results especially in chronic disease, is leading progressively to the develop- ment of increasingly toxic drugs, which themselves are becoming a significant public health menace.

It is evident to all thoughtful patients of today, furthermore, that the obsessive search for a concrete cause of illness is, in fact, not really the basis of modern therapeutics anyway. The vast majority of drugs pre- scribed for illnesses such as arthritis, asthma, colitis, ulcers, heart dis- ease, epilepsy, anxiety, and depression are not designed to be curative, even in their original conception. They do not strike at the cause at all but merely offer a rather pallid hope for palliation, even if we disregard the danger of side effects. This in itself is a sign of the helplessness of modern medicine to deal effectively with disease.

Thus we see that orthodox medicine (referred to throughout this book as allopathy, derived from the Greek roots signifying “other” and “suffering”) has built for itself a structure strong in finances, in- stitutional inertia, and political connections but simultaneously weak in basic laws and principles. In general, medicine has found itself in the midst of a scientific society experiencing the greatest technological advances ever witnessed in history, yet ironically with almost no laws or principles to justify its methods. Any science is a system based on laws and principles verified by continuous experimental and experien- tial data. orthodox medicine calls itself a “science,” but does it really deserve that name? Where are its laws and principles, which are the foundation of any science?

Consider, for a moment, what the ideal therapeutic system should be. of course, it must be effective, but it must be effective with mini- mal or, ideally, no risk to the patient. Its effectiveness must be based upon not merely the alleviation or the absence of symptoms but on the enhanced constitutional strength and well-being of the individual – on the increased ability of the individual to live to the fullest. It should not be prohibitively expensive, of course, and it should be readily acces- sible and understandable to all members of the population.

Most importantly, though, the ideal therapeutic system must have a clear conception of the following questions: