Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 304

states.
This situation is encountered most often in patients who have been using allopathic drugs to suppress a specific physical problem. Perhaps the patient has been using occasional applications of topical cortisone to control a skin eruption on the hands. The patient believes that the amount of cortisone being used is insignificant because it is “needed” only twice a week on

an average; even so, the important point is not the dosage but the fact that the appli- cations were enough to keep the symptom suppressed. Such cases frequently have a prolonged aggravation of the local symp- tom after discontinuing the cortisone and taking the correct remedy.
Therefore, the interpretation is that the remedy was the simillimum, and it is im- portant to wait.

INTENSITY
OF CC
SYMPTOMS

E M/E

REMEDY

TIME PERIOD 1 MONTH

Figure 36:

CASE XXI:

Patient: “I have been worse during the whole month.”
Case: Chief complaint worse, the whole month. Others definitely better.

Interpretation: Correct remedy. Good prognosis.
Prognosis: Wait

CASE XXI:

This is very similar to Case XX, but here there is a very definite amelioration on the energy and mental/emotional levels. Even at the end of the month the patient reports that the physical chief complaint is also somewhat better than prior to taking the remedy.
This is a curative response, and the cor- rect remedy was given. It is very desirable for an eruption to occur on the skin, or for

a discharge to be produced from skin or mucous membranes, during a noticeable amelioration of symptoms from deeper levels of the organism. Such a response is definitely curative, and under no circum- stances should the local symptom be al- lowed to be suppressed by any means. Such suppression would stop the cure and cause a further degeneration of the general health of the patient.