Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 302

aggravation appears to be identical to the original prescription, then a higher potency must be given.
If the situation is clearly not serious and the remedy image is not yet clear, then the policy should be to wait until a clear image does emerge. (The reader will naturally understand the depth of knowledge a ho- meopath must have in order to be able to judge that a symptom-picture of a patient presents a clear, or as yet unclear, image of a remedy). It is not uncommon in such an aggravated case for a few symptoms to pro- vide clues to what the next remedy will be, but one must wait as long as possible until

the full image becomes clear. Of course, if the condition is deteriorating too rapidly, then one cannot wait, and must immediate- ly give a remedy based upon the best pos- sible image in the moment; but whenever possible it is better to allow the defense mechanism to provide a clear image. In such dramatic instances, in which the de- fense mechanism has been violently acti- vated by the disease, it is probable that one will witness the emergence of a clear-cut picture of a remedy quite soon, in which case it will not be necessary to wait longer than perhaps two or three days before the clear image can be discerned.

INTENSITY
OF SYMPTOMS

REMEDY

TIME PERIOD 1 MONTH

Figure 34:

CASE XIX:

Patient: “I have been worse, except for a brief time.”
Case: Definite long aggravation, then better for 4 or 5 days, finally becoming worse again.
Interpretation: Nearly incurable case. Severe pathology. Poor prognosis.

Prescriptions must be made very carefully. Prescription: 1) Search for new remedy of the relapsed state. 2) If same image, re- peat same remedy in higher potency. 3) If remedy image unclear, wait about 15 days
for a new image.

CASE XIX:

Another adverse situation has occurred when the patient reports a strong, prolong-

ed, and progressive aggravation folowed by a distinct amelioration for only a short