Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 297

INTENSITY
OF SYMPTOMS

E CC
M/E

REMEDY

TIME PERIOD 1 MONTH

Figure 29:

CASE XIV:

Patient: “I am the same.”
Case: “Closed” patient. Admits, “Well, I am less irritable with my husband, but then he has been nicer to me lately.”
Interpretation: Remedy may be be-

ginnin to act especially when a “closed” patient admits a change on an important level.
Prescription: Must wait.

CASE XIV:

Intellectualized, “closed” patients- people who tend to repress emotional ex- pression – can present great difficulties for interpretation. Such people tend to intel- lectually “explain away” everything, so responses which are truly actions of the remedy are not reported because the pa- tient attributes them to other influences. In addition, “closed” patients are generally unimpressed by any changes short of the dramatic. They are hard to convince, and therefore they tend to withhold some of the seemingly unimportant clues which sig- nify movement toward cure.
The best way to illustrate this is by a case from my own experience. A woman had been suffering severely from an ex- tensive neurodermatitis for over 7 years. She was a “closed” patient, and the initial history was difficult to obtain. During the one-month follow-up visit, she reported no change at all. During careful questioning, she reluctantly admitted, “Well, I am

less irritable with my husband, but then he has been nicer to me lately.” This was the only change noted, but it was significant because it was an emotional symptom. In a “closed” patient, such symptoms are not easily given, so they carry more weight when they are expressed. For this reason, no further remedy was given. At the two- month follow-up visit, the patient still had noticed no change, but further questioning showed that the irritability continued to be even less. So, again no remedy was pre- scribed. Then, at about 21/2 months after the first remedy, improvement in the skin began to occur, and by the three-month visit, the patient felt perfectly well in every respect, and the cure has lasted now for many years.
This case illustrates the extreme care required in evaluating the response to the remedy. The tendency to ignore the re- duced irritability because it seemed easily explainable by other influences could have