Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 294

INTENSITY
OF SYMPTOMS

E M/E CC

Figure 26:

CASE XI:

REMEDY

TIME PERIOD 1 MONTH

Patient: “I was better, now the same as 1 was.”
Case: Amelioration without aggrava- tion, then return to full relapse.
Interpretation: Either 1) Partial remedy causing only a temporary, non-curative amelioration. Or 2) incurable case,

especially if remedy image during relapse is changed.
Prescription: Interpretation 1) Look again at original case to find a better rem- edy. Interpretation 2) Find new remedy based on new image.

CASE XI:

As in Case X, the patient describes a defi- nite amelioration, followed by a full re- lapse. However, this time careful question- ing reveals that no aggravation occurred in the first few days. Of course, some patients may simply not clearly remember whether there was an aggravation, but this case ap- plies primarily to those in whom there was definitely no aggravation, but an immedi- ate amelioration, and finally a full relapse within one month.
Again, this example strongly underscores the importance of careful questioning dur- ing the follow-up visit. If the homeopath believes too readily the initial description of the patient, it is likely that the same rem- edy would be repeated. In this example, the seemingly unimportant inquiry into the presence or absence of an initial aggrava- tion can make all the difference in proper interpretation.

Once it is definitely determined that there was no initial aggravation, there are two possible interpretations. On the one hand, the remedy may have been close, but only partial in its action. The response may have been merely temporary, noncurative, pal- liative – a “glancing” effect. (In such cases, however, an important clue is found in the fact that we never witness a true elevation of the energy level of the patient.) Consid- ering this possibility, the homeopath must take a careful look at the original case to see if a more precise remedy might have been missed. If so, then the more precise remedy should be given at this point.
Another interpretation, however, is that this is an incurable case. This interpreta- tion would apply most clearly to those cases with severe pathology. Another clue is elicited by re-taking the complete case. If the amelioration has occurred without