Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 291

CASE VIII:

This situation represents a somewhat un- usual eventuality, but one which requires a good knowledge of homeopathy to inter- pret. The patient feels very little change in any realm, except that the chief complaint might be a little bit better. Meanwhile, however, a spectrum of new symptoms emerge which show even greater intensity than the original ailment and which now present a clear picture of a new remedy.
This is an example of what Hahnemann calls one-sided cases (described in Apho- risms 172-184). The initial disease image represented only a fragment of the totality. Hahnemann describes their cases as exhibiting only one or two symptoms upon which to prescribe, but in my experience, there can be quite a few more. The primary principle involved here is that the full to- tality is not expressed in the initial image. This can occur for a variety of reasons: the case may have been severely suppressed by allopathic drugs, the patient may have become too withdrawn and “closed,” or the energy of the defense mechanism may have become excessively focused upon just a few symptoms.
In any case, the full image was not present initially, and the first prescription therefore was only partial to the full case. Nevertheless, it was close enough to create a beneficial effect, and the organism was then freed to express the full totality

of symptoms. The patient may complain that harm has been created by the remedy because of all the new symptoms, but in re- ality the homeopath is now in a position to prescribe a truly curative remedy.
In this situation, the entire case must be carefully re-taken in order to elucidate the full totality. A new remedy should then be prescribed upon the full image. If a correct remedy is chosen, the ensuing response can be expected to be very favorable.
There are many homeopaths who talk about giving first prescriptions designed to “clear” a case. If many allopathic drugs have been given, or if other factors have produced confusion in a case, such homeo- paths begin the case routinely (paying only scant attention to the full totality of symp- toms) with Nux vomica, Pulsatilla, Carbo vegetabilis, or nosodes. The expectation is that the true constitutional prescription will later become clear. This is a confu- sion. Remedies can indeed “clear” a case if it is “one-sided,” but only the most pre- cisely chosen prescription will affect such a change. It takes considerable skill and thought to find such a remedy; it certainly cannot be done reliably by just a few min- utes of routine prescribing. More likely, a routine prescription will further confuse the case, leading to even more difficulties later on.

INTENSITY
OF SYMPTOMS

REMEDY

TIME PERIOD 1 MONTH