Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 240

time, and the relapse will probably require a different remedy. For this reason, the homeopath must see such cases very frequently. The pa- tient should be instructed to contact the homeopath at the first indica- tion of a relapse. In these cases, one does not wait for a clear image to emerge, because the relapses can become very severe in a short period of time. One must enter right away with the correct remedy in order to maintain the state of palliation. This is the reason why I specify that only experienced homeopaths should undertake such cases; if even a single slip is made, the case can degenerate quickly into a severely relapsed condition and will show no clear signs or symptoms for a precise prescription. The prescriber does not have the luxury of being able to wait for a full symptom picture, and there is no margin for er- ror. Only a very experienced and knowledgeable homeopath has any chance of being able to manage such a case, and even then mistakes will inevitably be made.
Incurable cases will often react to a remedy by producing symp- toms which are pathognomonic of that remedy without a correspond- ing general amelioration. If this occurs, it is a bad sign, and a new prescription should be made quite soon. In a healthy individual, or one with a relatively strong constitution, such a “proving” can be a very positive sign, because there will eventually be an amelioration in the general health of the patient. However, incurable cases have a severe weakness in the defense mechanism. A remedy which is close, but not exact, can therefore stimulate the defense mechanism in a morbific way, rather than therapeutically. Therefore, the only thing to do in this instance is to take another look at symptoms which were present when the remedy was originally given; hopefully, a better medicine will be found which more precisely fits the image. This remedy will then re- turn the system to order.
Now let us turn to the curable patients who have had their cases disrupted by imprecise homeopathic prescribing. Even though the original diagnosis may be quite serious, there may be signs of a fairly strong constitution, the patient is relatively young, and there were some curative responses to one or two of the remedies given. However, for the past year or so, none of the prescriptions have seemed to have last- ing effect. In such a case, the homeopath can reasonably judge that the case is still curable, and an attempt can be made to find a series of remedies which will bring about order and cure.
If the case is not very serious, the best procedure is to simply wait a long time for the defense mechanism to settle down into a recogniz- able pattern. This can take a period of 3-10 months, so it is not a very practical recommendation for the majority of patients. However, some