Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 234

remedy in such instances. After a period of years of treatment, such cases may settle into a pattern of response which may require a repeti- tion of the same remedy, but this emergence of a so-called constitu- tional remedy is relatively unusual. This is true because there are so many miasmatic layers to be penetrated that continually new symptom pictures keep coming to the surface.
Acute ailments in such patients can be expected to be very severe. They tend to be both deep and prolonged, and often three or more pre- scriptions are needed to deal with the situation. Under the impact of a severe acute ailment and several homeopathic prescriptions, a relapse to the previous level of progress is quite likely to occur. For example, suppose a deep miasmatic case has been treated with three medicines over a period of six months, each having a beneficial effect – but during the sixth month, the patient acquires a very severe bronchitis. Suppose it requires three prescriptions to control the bronchitis. In such a cir- cumstance, it is likely that the patient’s chronic state will relapse back to the state just prior to the third prescription. If the resulting symptom picture happens to be the same as the third remedy, then it should be repeated in higher potency. If it is a different symptom picture, how- ever, the new remedy should be prescribed at whatever potency is indi- cated by the clarity of the image and the degree of pathological change. In patients of this second category, there is constant pressure to prescribe at every visit, and during moments of crisis in between. The patient is undergoing a great deal of suffering, and the constant com- plaining always presents a powerful temptation to give another reme- dy. If one succumbs to this temptation merely in order to stop the com- plaining, eventually a confusion of the case will occur. Recovery from mistaken prescriptions in patients with very weak defense mechanisms takes a very long time – so such hasty prescriptions in the long run will only maximize the suffering of the patient and minimize the reputa- tion of the prescriber. As a general principle, such patients should be allowed to suffer to the very limits of their endurance, and then they
should be prescribed for only when the new image has become clear. A solid knowledge of physical pathology is an important prerequi-
site for a homeopath attempting to manage such patients. It is all too easy to allow a patient to suffer while thinking that it is merely a phase in the direction of cure-when in fact pathological damage is occurring. Even for very knowledgeable and experienced clinicians this can be a very difficult judgment to make in many instances, but the possibility that there may be pathological damage must always be kept in mind.
It is in patients with deep miasmatic weaknesses that the most mis- takes in prescribing are made. Sometimes the mistakes are made be-