Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 232

successes in cases with strong constitutions, but the real test comes in cases belonging to this second category. These cases are still curable, but accomplishing cure demands great skill, training, judgment, expe- rience, and time on the part of the homeopath. It demands even more of the patient.
As we consider the first principle in regard to such patients, we see at once that we face great difficulties. Such deeply ill patients gen- erally do not show an easily discernible amelioration on the deepest levels. At even the initial interview, the past history and family history provide strong hints that the prognosis is guarded; with difficulty, an initial remedy is selected. Even then, the patient’s response is not as clear as one would wish. Often, progress can be determined only by subtle indications or improvement in minor symptoms. If one is able to wait long enough, a slowly curative response may occur over a period of one or two years (requiring a few more remedies, carefully chosen). The natural question arises, “Assuming the response is not very obvious and the patient is suffering, how long can one wait?” The answer to this question, of course, depends greatly upon the individual circumstances, and upon the experience of the homeopath. The most helpful clue is found in the regions of most central importance to the patient’s ability to truly live creatively. If even subtle changes for the better are occurring on the energy or mental/emotional levels, then the inclination will be to wait, even though the patient may be suffer- ing severely on more peripheral levels. At each visit, progress must be
evaluated very carefully, particularly in central areas.
Often, prescribers will encounter members of this category who complain that the original symptoms really are getting worse after the initial remedy. This aggravation of physical symptoms may become intolerable, say, between 20 days and three months after the remedy, in spite of the fact that the patient feels better in himself. The inclination, of course, should be to try to wait out the aggravation, but it sometimes happens that the local symptoms become unbearable. One can be justi- fied to enter with another remedy in this situation, provided the image of the next remedy is definitely clear.
In patients of the second category, if a skin eruption occurs in re- sponse to the first prescription, it can be expected to occur with great violence – and it will not be the last problem the patient will encounter. In this situation, the defense mechanism is trying to bring about a cure even though its process is producing severe suffering on the surface of the body. One must wait to the very limit of the patient’s endurance. This situation tries the souls of both the patient and the prescriber. If it gets to the point that a new prescription becomes absolutely necessary,