Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 226

severe, and the patient may be telephoning the prescriber daily. Never- theless, the first step is to determine whether the suffering is really as severe as before the original remedy. If so, the next step is to determine whether a clear image is emerging, and whether it has stabilized. One must not be in a hurry to prescribe while symptoms are changing. The situation may still be in a state of transition; the remedy image may have been present for only two or three days, in which case it is entirely possible that it will eventually move on to another image. Whenever possible, one must wait until the remedy image has stabilized for at least 15 days or so, in which case one can be reasonably sure that a remedy based upon the stable image will not be disruptive and may well be beneficial.
Of course, as we shall see, there are desperate circumstances when this principle cannot be strictly followed. Despite these exceptions, ev- ery effort must be made to let the patient push the limits of endurance in order to clearly perceive the next remedy image. In the long run, observance of this principle will shorten the period of suffering – even though in the moment it may seem to be a cruel course of action.
Principle No. 3: Do not be in a hurry to prescribe if an old symp- tom, or complex of old symptoms (especially), is returning. If a patient admits to having experienced the same symptoms within a few months or years prior to taking the remedy as are found within the first six months after taking the remedy – the best course of action is to wait. In this instance, it is very important to have taken a very complete case. In the confusion of the moment and the desire of the patient to have the homeopath “do something” in a situation which may seem a “degen- eration” to a previous condition, the patient may be reluctant to report fully the fact that the new set of symptoms is indeed a manifestation of a previous state. The prescriber must inquire very carefully into this possibility in order to be perfectly sure of the real situation.
Principle No. 4; Do not prescribe a remedy if a skin eruption or discharge appears and is accompanied by a general amelioration. In chronic cases, it frequently happens that the correct remedy is followed by a reaction producing a skin eruption or discharge. In a patient with a strong defense mechanism, this eruption or discharge may be intense but brief. In someone with a weaker defense mechanism, the eruption or discharge may be severely disturbing and prolonged. This can be- come quite alarming to the patient (who thinks that his or her health is seriously deteriorating), and to the homeopath who is plagued by urgent telephone calls. Nevertheless, the prescriber must not be hurried into prescribing another remedy unless the situation is beyond endur- ance and the next remedy image is clear.