Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 222

There are many dynamics within the patient which can mislead the homeopath, in addition to the usual interviewing problems which can cause the prescriber to “lead” the patient into a misinterpretation.
The next variable is the homeopathic prescription itself. Was the remedy active in its original state? Was the prescription the true simil- limum? Was it merely close to the exact simillimum and therefore only partially acting? Was it too far from the simillimum to be of any effect? Was the remedy close enough to create a suppressive or disruptive ef- fect? Has the remedy been antidoted by some action of the patient? There are all issues which must be correctly evaluated if the second prescription is going to further help the patient. If the evaluation is incorrect, it may well disorder the action of the first prescription.
Another variable is the state of health of the patient. During the first interview, many clues are discovered which can help the prescriber decide upon a prognosis in the case. A true prognosis cannot be found, however, until there has been an opportunity to evaluate the patient’s response to the medicine. It is at this point that the degree of incurabil- ity of a case can be truly determined.
Throughout the history of homeopathic prescribing, clinical expe- rience has gradually evolved verifiable interpretations of the various responses patients demonstrate after taking a remedy. usually, homeo- pathic literature has focused upon the issue of finding the correct rem- edy in each case. However, the most astute and careful homeopathic observers gradually began to discover patterns of response to remedies which have particular meanings. Finally, these observations culmi- nated in the rule formulated by Constantine Hering as Hering’s Law: cure proceeds from above downward, from within outward, from the most important organs to least important organs, and in the reverse order of appearance of symptoms. To this might be added an impor- tant corollary: cure proceeds by amelioration on internal planes cou- pled with the appearance of a discharge or eruption of skin or mucous membranes. This elaboration of the original law does not add any new concepts, but it does make more vivid the kind of changes which occur during the process of cure.
This rule of interpretation is a valuable guideline for determining whether a remedy is acting. It simply and correctly expresses the prin- ciples described in Section I of this book. During the process of cure, the defense mechanism generates changes in vibration rate which pro- gressively move to more and more peripheral levels of the organism. If cure is in progress, symptoms will manifest at levels which are pro- gressively of less crucial importance to the freedom of the individual to express fullness and creativity in life. This is the concept underlying