Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 218

1. How does the patient feel in general? Has his or her health improved, declined, or been left unchanged by the remedy? Patients usually tend to focus on specifics, especially after experiencing the unexpected amount of detail involved in the initial interview, but it is important to discern the overall impression at the outset.
2. Has the degree of energy been affected? Is the patient experi encing greater energy and motivation during daily existence, has it declined, or has it remained unchanged? Has there been any change in the ability of the patient to cope with the various stresses of life?
3. Has there been any change in the physical chief complaint – the original problem for which the homeopath was consulted? What was the pattern of its change during the month, if any?
4. What changes have occurred on the mental and emotional planes? Since these symptoms represent the core of existence of the patient, even seemingly insignificant changes on this level can signal important effects of the remedy.
5. Next, the original case should be reviewed, symptom by symp- tom, to determine whether changes have occurred, for better or for worse. The usual tendency during follow-up visits is to stop once an impression has been gained of the overall effect. This tendency should be resisted. All of the symptoms elicited during the initial interview should be asked about, and the resulting condition appropriately noted down and underlined.
6. Any new symptoms should be inquired into. Sometimes these will be symptoms from the past, in which case their previous timing should be noted carefully. If the symptoms are truly new, all appropri- ate modifiers and descriptions of them should be carefully recorded.
7. The patient should always be given a chance to elaborate further upon previously described symptoms. After the patient has had time to reflect upon questions raised in the initial interview and once a better rapport has been established, it becomes possible to penetrate further into the “essence” of the case. This, of course, can be vitally important, so the homeopath must not allow an insistence upon any specific for- mat to interfere with expression of such information. As enumerated here, this aspect of the follow-up interview is listed last, but in reality it could and should be elicited at any point in the interview.

During a follow-up interview, by far the most important informa- tion is gathered from the first four areas of the above format. The over- all state of health, the general energy of the patient, the chief complaint and the mental/emotional changes all provide the most important clues to evaluating the response to the first prescription. These should be