Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 217

must be seen sooner than one month. Particularly in patients with very serious pathological changes, the pace of the ailment may be more rapid, and the patient may even have to be seen within a few days after the initial remedy. This is the case with hospitalized patients, but for out-patients in general the tendency to evaluate cases on a day-by-day or week-by-week basis should be discouraged. Although such frequent visits may be reassuring to the patient, they place undue pressure upon the prescriber to “do something.” Such pressure easily leads to pre- scriptions which in the long run can be disruptive to the orderly pro- cess of cure.

Format for the Follow-Up Visit

Traditionally, follow-up visits are scheduled for shorter lengths of time than are first visits. This is natural and appropriate because it takes time to develop a full understanding of the patient at the first meeting, but this should not in any sense diminish the importance of the follow-up visit in the mind of the homeopath or the patient. The attitude of the prescriber must be as careful and thorough as possible, because the actual challenges are in some ways greater during follow- up visits. Notes must be taken with the same reliability and underlin- ing of symptoms followed as painstakingly. The common practice of listing follow-ups in terms of simple notations of “better,” “worse,” or “unchanged” is inadequate, because far more is involved.
To the homeopath, a follow-up visit presents a series of decisions which must be made unerringly:

1. What was the response to the first remedy (independent of the patient’s subjective interpretation)? Has the medicine produced a cura- tive response? Was it only a partial remedy, producing only unimport- ant changes? Was it suppressive, causing ultimately a worsening of the overall health of the patient? Or was it merely an incorrect prescrip- tion, producing no significant response?
2. Is another medicine required, or is it best to wait?
3. If another prescription is required, what is the correct remedy and potency?

With these tasks in mind, a basic format can be described which highlights the important information. Of course, such a format can- not be rigidly followed. Each case is unique, and every interview is therefore different from every other one. Nevertheless, the information which is gained can be ordered into a basic sequence: