Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 212

Chapter 15

The Follow-up Interview

T is COMMON in homeopathic prescribing to focus attention al- most solely on the original symptom complex and the finding of the first remedy. Although it is true that the most important prescription in any given case is the initial one, it must be understood that it is equally important to be able to interpret correctly the patient’s response to the original remedy. It seems easier for the homeopath to approach the follow-up visit as a simple matter of deciding whether the patient has or has not responded to the initial prescription. If the patient expresses satisfaction, the prescriber breathes a sigh of relief and confidently recommends the most common of all homeopathic prescriptions – “Wait.” If, on the other hand, the patient does not seem satisfied and little seems to have happened, then the homeopath settles down to the
task of trying to decide upon a better prescription.
Actually, the true situation is much more complex than this, and decisions made during follow-up visits cannot be made so simplisti- cally or casually. Although the first prescription is the most impor- tant decision made in homeopathy, the follow-up prescription is very likely the most difficult prescription. In the first interview the goal is relatively simple: to analyze the case in such a way as to arrive at the correct remedy. Follow-up interviews, however, involve much more complex judgments. Is the patient truly better? Is the remedy produc- ing the desired response, or has it missed, or produced only a partial effect? Now that the response to the initial prescription is known, what is the true prognosis of the patient? Should a remedy be given at this point, or should the potency be changed? Or is this the time to wait for further developments? Perhaps it is clear that the patient has not re-