Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 204

closely, the process of case analysis will appear to be extremely rapid in the hands of an advanced prescriber.
If the essence of a remedy is perceived in the patient and a few other symptoms confirm it, then no further thought need be given to the prescription. The situation becomes more complex when there are one or two symptoms which strongly go against the remedy. Then the homeopath must go all the way back to the beginning and reconsider the entire case. In this circumstance, even the advanced homeopath will spend as much time and care selecting the remedy as the beginner. As a matter of fact, the procedure for selecting a remedy in such a case is essentially the same as would be true for the beginner. The entire to- tality is considered carefully, all uncertainties are taken into account, the appropriate rubrics in the Repertory are reviewed, and finally par- ticular attention is paid to the peculiar symptoms. Great thought is put into the case; perhaps a somewhat compromise judgment is made. Nevertheless, the final prescription will match as closely as possible the totality of symptoms of the patient with the totality of manifesta- tions of the remedy.
In such complex cases, it may be necessary to “throw out” even important mental or general symptoms and to rely on seemingly less significant but more peculiar symptoms. Precisely how this is done cannot be described adequately in a book. Every case is so unique that it would be impossible to generalize about such judgments. They come from experience, and to a great extent they can only be learned in a su- pervised setting. Such judgments belong to the realm of art rather than science, even though there are always very cogent reasons for them.
Frequently, cases are encountered in which there are many com- mon symptoms but only two peculiar symptoms. Acquiring a distinc- tive totality of symptoms is impossible. Repertorization is done, but because the symptoms are common, a large number of remedies come up which inevitably are those most widely proven – remedies which we call “polychrests.” Such analysis and repertorization have little chance of producing the correct remedy. In this situation, it is permissible to focus solely on the peculiar symptoms – even disregarding the reper- torization altogether. The remedy is selected from the rubrics describ- ing the peculiar symptoms, and often the prescription will tend to be a rather unusual remedy. As always, careful study of the materia medi- cas must be made before deciding upon such a selection.
Occasionally, a case is encountered in which the chronic state arose very dramatically out of a powerful exciting cause. For example, a pa- tient might be seen whose miasmatic background is quite insignificant but whose entire spectrum of, say, neurological complaints, dates from