Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 199

food they eat, who catch a cold very easily, etc. – such patients are more likely to have a poor prognosis. Their systems are unable to maintain a stable equilibrium, and the defense mechanism must be brought con- stantly into play in order to restore balance.

4. The past history and the family history. Patients with a history of deep and serious diseases, or who have had a great deal of suppres- sive therapy are more likely to encounter problems on the way to cure. Also, patients arising out of families with many deep miasmatic influ- ences – i.e., deaths at early ages from serious pathological changes, relatives with chronic debilitating diseases, severe mental disturbances in the family, etc. – can be expected to have more difficulty during the course of treatment.

 

If any of the above factors are observed in a given patient, the index of suspicion should be raised immediately. Even one such factor should be taken as a clue to potential difficulty, and further questioning must be carefully directed to comprehend the depth of disease in the pa- tient. Occasionally, a patient will exhibit only one of the above factors without carrying a strongly adverse prognosis. Usually, however, if one of these factors is present, the others tend to be there as well. Patients with all four aspects, no matter how minor the presenting complaint, should raise a “red flag” in the mind of the homeopath. In such cases, the minor complaint may be the “tip of the iceberg,” and much time and energy will be required to bring such a patient to a reasonable de- gree of health.

 

Case Analysis for the Beginner

 

The next task in studying an initial case is to find the correct rem- edy, the simillimum. To the beginner with only a limited knowledge of materia medica, this decision can be very difficult, especially in chronic cases. Nevertheless, it must be emphasized that the choice of the initial remedy is the most crucial decision made in homeopathy. No shortcuts should be taken, and any judgments must be made with great circumspection. The first remedy is the one which opens up the case, which brings out the true healing potential of the defense mecha- nism, and which sets the case either in a direction toward greater order or toward confusion and disorder. Often, because the initial case has not yet been spoiled by previous incorrect prescribing, the choice of initial remedy is an easier decision than choosing later remedies; even so, it must be remembered that it is the most important prescription of all.