Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 195

Chapter 14

 

Case Analysis and First Prescription

 

THUS FAR, we have discussed the process of case-taking and the general principles involved in grading symptoms and their listing according to homeopathic importance. We have also considered in a general way the organization of the Repertory and how an individual symptom can be studied in it. Now we are in a position to go into more depth about how a case is analyzed, and also how the first remedy is chosen.

Throughout this narrative, it will often seem that the analysis of a case and the choice of remedy are routine or mathematical judgments based upon concrete rules. This seems to be true because of the nec- essary difficulties of trying to translate a very complex process into language which is clear and understandable. The laws and principles involved in choosing a remedy, as described in Section 1, are definite and verifiable. However, their application to each individual case is a complex matter; the judgments involved result from a fusion between art and science. The reader should not get the idea that this process can be accomplished by thoughtless or computerized routines. Nor should the conclusion be drawn that prescriptions made by advanced pre- scribers are made somehow by psychic intuition or magical processes. There is a definite process involved which is soundly based upon solid laws and principles and yet which is also artistic in individual applica- tion. The homeopath uses a wide spectrum of information from the patient, plus a broad knowledge of homeopathic principles and Materia Medica, and then fuses all of this into a “gestalt” understanding upon