Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 177

perhaps only after confirmation by objective co-workers or relatives. Often, these patients are very intent upon impressing the homeopath with how very sick they believe themselves to be. No particular ap- proach on the part of the interviewer can counteract such behavior, but it is best to present a demeanor of objective understanding without excessive display of sympathy or alarm. Meanwhile, the patient should be encouraged to take an overall view of his condition, to summarize and highlight symptoms, and to communicate only those which are most persistent.

A third group of problem patients are the intellectuals – those highly educated people relying upon their minds for success in life. One might think that intellectuals would make the best homeopathic patients because their observations should be more astute than other people’s. As a matter of fact, the opposite is true. Intellectuals tend to relate to reality according to what is explainable to their minds; if something is peculiar or unexplainable, they tend to block it out of awareness altogether. Thus, intellectuals tend to see commonality in things, rather than individuality, and are unlikely to be able to report their own unique symptoms. They evaluate or interpret their symptoms in terms of what they have read, what theories are current, what con- jectures fit their philosophy of life; in this way, they “explain away” the very symptoms of most value to the homeopath. A simple, uneducated man expresses his symptoms with much more clarity and exactness than an intellectual. For example, if the intellectual admits that he has some anxiety, he immediately hastens to explain that this is natural because of the hectic environment he is forced to live in. Or if he has a fear, he explains it as being due to a traumatic experience in childhood, and asserts, “I am almost certain that that fear has been 80% overcome by now.” Because of such conjecturing and reasoning, it becomes impossible for the homeopath to be sure whether the fear is a significant symptom or not. The homeopath then asks, “How do you sleep?” The intellectual replies, “Oh, I do have quite a bit of sleepless- ness, but that is certainly due to the irregular night life I must lead.”

In the end, after a long and involved interview, the homeopath has a mass of symptoms all of which are qualified by the phrase, “Yes, but…” In such cases, there may be no symptoms whatsoever upon which to prescribe with any reliability. These are very difficult cases to evalu- ate. The homeopath must be skeptical of the explanations offered by the intellectual patient, and must always keep in mind whether the severity of the symptom is in reality proportional to the explanations offered. For example, many people have traumatic childhood experi- ences or lead demanding lives with irregular sleeping hours, but how