Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 166

utmost importance that the interviewer be interested and concerned with the welfare of the patient. This interest may be conveyed by a few unobtrusive questions posed from time to time during the patient’s narrative and by listening with great care and attention. If the inter- viewer is sincerely interested, the patient will feel more motivated to provide the information needed.

There should be no implication of judgment on the part of the pre- scriber. Symptoms provided by the patient should be accepted with in- terest, but without judgment. Advice should not be offered, and moral injunctions should be avoided. If the patient feels judged, he will likely withdraw within himself and refuse to divulge the very information of most value.

An unprejudiced mind on the part of the prescriber is important not only for the comfort and freedom of expression of the patient, but also for the prescriber’s own ability to perceive the truth of the case. All too often, the tendency is to try to catalogue symptoms into interpretations based upon previous experience or upon a knowledge of materia med- ica. This process is inevitable to some extent, but the interview must be very circumspect about it. One should be very suspicious about any habitual or unconscious attempt to pigeonhole the expression of the patient into preconceived categories.

This is the essence of the empirical approach to medicine; it is ex- cellently described in Hahnemann’s Aphorism 100:

 

. . . it is quite immaterial whether or not something similar has ever appeared in the world before under the same or any other name. The novelty or peculiarity of a disease of that kind makes no difference either in the mode of examining or of treating it, as the physician must any way regard the pure picture of every prevailing disease as if it were something new and unknown, and investigate it thoroughly for itself, if he desire to practice medicine in a real and radical manner, never substituting conjecture for actual observation, never taking for granted that the case of disease before him is already wholly or par- tially known, but always carefully examining it in all its phases.1

 

This point is then further elaborated by J.T. Kent, one of the great- est of homeopathic prescribers ever, who humbly admits how readily prejudices tend to creep into the process. In this paragraph, he com- ments on the above aphorism of Hahnemann:

 

Keep that in your mind, underscore it half a dozen times with red

 

1. S. Hahnemann, Organon of Medicine.