Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 164

dents take notes on the other side of the mirror. Afterward, the instruc- tor can look over the notes and offer suggestions regarding the subtle- ties and emphases involved in the case. Initially, his feedback in the very process of taking notes and interpreting the patient’s responses is very valuable for the beginning student. It helps develop the neces- sary sensitivity to each patient, as well as the objectivity to accurately translate the expressions of the patient into information useable in the homeopathic framework.

Later, the student must become involved in taking cases personally. The homeopathic interviewer needs to become conscious of his or her own responses to the patient, and a certain discipline must be learned in the actual interview situation. A balance must be struck between the need for accurate objective information, sensitivity to what the patient is truly expressing, and the establishing of a rapport which enables the patient to feel comfortable enough to share the most intimate of feelings and experiences. This process as well should ideally be super- vised by an experienced homeopath, so that the interviewer can further refine his or her interviewing skills. Every interviewer has a unique personality, and therefore a unique style of conducting an interview, and each patient requires an individualized approach. It is nevertheless necessary to refine the needed skills so that the information finally recorded on paper will be reliable enough for further study.

The information gathered during the homeopathic interview is fully half of the process leading to eventual cure. A well-taken case which provides living images of the patient and which is thorough can be fruitfully studied for hours on end, not only for the purpose of ar- riving at a remedy, but also from the standpoint of learning about fun- damental interactions between health and disease. A well-taken case is a valuable experience for the patient as well, because it becomes an opportunity to consciously examine the most crucial and intimate regions of his or her life.

On the other hand, a poorly taken case can be a source of endless frustration. The more one studies such a case, the more one becomes confused about what is really happening with the patient, and any prescription based upon such information will be mere guesswork. If the information is not improved on subsequent visits, it is possible to follow such a case for years, continuing to disrupt the image by prescriptions based upon guesswork, until finally the case becomes incurable. Such is the experience of every homeopath in the early years while gaining experience, but the damage can at least be minimized by proper supervision and practical training.

The purpose of the homeopathic interview is to accurately arrive