Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 160

 

Centesimal                                  Decimal                                      50 – Millesimal

 

 

PROTENCY      DILUTION

 

1c

2c 3c

 

No. SUCCUSSIONS

 

 

PROTENCY DILUTION

 

No.

SUCCUSSIONS

 

 

PROTENCY DILUTION

 

No.

SUCCUSSIONS

 

 

 1

100

1x

 1

100

1m

 1

102

 

 

10

 

 

50×104

 1

200

2x

 1

200

2m

 1

104

 

 

102

 

 

2.5×109

 1

300

3x

 1

300

3m

 1

106

103

1.25×1014

 

100

 

 

200

 

300

 

 

 1                                                         1                                                       1

6c

1012

600

6x

106

600

6m

1.5×1026

600

 

 1

 

 

 1

 

 

 1

 

30c

1060

3.000

30x

1030

3.000

30m

9×10136

3.000

 

 1

 

 

 1

 

 

 1

 

200c

10400

20.000

200x

10200

20.000

200m

9×10919

20.000

 

Figure 14: A comparison of dilutions and succussions at each potency level on each scale. This table can be studied in two ways. One can compare a certain number of succussions (say, 20.000) with the extreme differences in dilution found on different scales. Another way is to consider which potencies have approximately similar amounts of dilution yet have received quite different numbers of succussions.
 

Describing this split as being based upon the potencies used by ho- meopaths does not adequately express the true nature of the schism. Those prescribers who broke from the leadership of Hahnemann tended to reject not only his use of high potencies, but many of his other principles as well. They favored mixing many remedies together, giving a variety of potencies at once, repeating remedies frequently throughout days or weeks, prescribing upon the organ affected or the diagnostic label, giving remedies to produce ‘’drainage” of the sys- tem, etc. In short, the low potency prescribers by and large utilized homeopathic remedies in an almost purely allopathic manner. These practices are still in vogue in many areas of the world today and are se- riously disrupting the possibilities of cure of many thousands of cases. It is also misleading to describe classical Hahnemannian prescribers as high potency prescribers. A homeopath conforming to the strict laws of homeopathy is likely to use any potency, depending upon the individual needs of the patient. It is true that they most commonly rely upon potencies above Avogadro’s number, but there are always circumstances when even a 6 X may be used. Thus, the true schism has little to do with the potencies used but rather with the entire philosophy and method of prescribing.

 

Annotated Bibliography for Chapter 11

 

1. Hahnemann’s description of Causticum: