Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 127

tized material from an itch vesicle) is not given. Instead, the symptoms indicate Calcarea carbonica, and indeed the clinical improvement con- firms its resonance with the vibration level of the second layer.

Such an example is very instructive because it illustrates nicely the basic principles involved. Each prescription is based on the best total- ity of symptoms of the moment, but during the acute crises the acute symptoms lead us to relatively superficially acting remedies. As will be seen in the practical section of this book, it very rarely occurs that a remedy can be found which covers every detailed symptom of the patient. Consequently, there are always a few relatively minor symp- toms which are disregarded. Over a period of time, however, recogniz- ing that the predisposing layer has not been dealt with, we review the entire case and discover a few of these somewhat “hidden” symptoms which lead us to the deeper acting remedy. This illustrates the value of having the patient continue to return for appointments even when not suffering an acute crisis; often it is during the relatively quiet times that subtler symptoms are most easily discerned.

One might ask whether Calcarea carbonica should have been given at the very beginning in this case example. First of all, it is very unlike- ly that it would have been possible to even see the image of Calcarea carbonica at the beginning, because the topmost layer had not been re- moved. If by chance, Calcarea carbonica had been given, it very likely would not have acted because the resonant frequency at that moment did not match. If it were close enough to produce some changes, it would not have produced a cure and very likely would have changed the symptom image sufficiently to make later prescribing very diffi- cult. This kind of misunderstanding can create havoc in a case and seriously interfere with the possibility of eventual cure.

Some homeopaths begin a case by routinely giving the various no- sodes which correspond to the patient’s past history and family his- tory, on the theory that the miasms must be “cleared” before the con- stitutional remedy is given. A typical such routine might be to give the nosodes once a week or once a month in sequence, and then to take the constitutional case after the sequence has been completed. These routines are utterly unthinking and very dangerous. Who is to say which of the diseases in the past history actually created a miasm? And who can determine the precise sequence of layers? Sometimes, of course, one of the nosodes may produce some degree of benefit, but if insufficient time is allowed to elapse after its action, whatever benefit has been created will be disrupted by subsequent prescriptions. It is always necessary to take the entire case and prescribe only after careful thought about the best choice of remedy, the best choice of po-