Books

A New Model For Health And Disease – Page 28

Research institutions have become the leading medical authorities, and their findings are considered absolute and final. The belief of the system in their "discoveries" has been so great that on certain occasions, when physicians have refused to follow the prescribed regimen, they have been placed in jeopardy of losing their license. Does any medical doctor dare not prescribe chemotherapy for cancer patients today? Yet it is certain that after a period of time such treatment will be outmoded and probably forbidden. Nobody has ever complained about such inconsistencies, even though they cause humanity so much pain and anguish.
Established medicine is pouring millions of dollars, tons of adoration, and very little criticism into these centers. Those few enlightened individuals who raise their voices in protest to various practices run the risk of being ostracized by the very same conservative, "closed" medical society to which they themselves belong.
Meanwhile, there has been a frantic race taking place in the research centers. The opponents to beat are time and pathological agents. That task is quite difficult since the pathogens are so invasive and elusive that no serious researcher dare make any promises or predictions. What they are actually doing at the centers is randomly, without any guiding principles, testing different drugs which would kill or eliminate the pathogen. The most important discoveries of drugs that have been considered really original were made accidentally, e.g. penicillin, aspirin, etc.
This means that the whole process involved in the development of a therapeutic agent is not based on an inductive process, guided by underlying laws and principles, but almost exclusively on the experience of a single individual who has observed certain phenomena in the laboratory. Whereas every other scientific field bases its research upon established laws and principles and then seeks to verify those principles in an organized way, much medical research proceeds in a random, indeterminate and accidental manner. Thus, medicine is more rightly deemed empirical rather than scientific.
Such criticism may sound prejudiced or unfair; nonetheless, the fact remains that most significant therapeutic medical advances owe their advent to fortuitous research findings. New