Books

A New Model For Health And Disease – Page 191

The deeper reasons for this state of affairs:
I believe the major contributing factor to the appalling situ¬ation in which we find ourselves is the fact that the medical establishment monopolized the right to provide medical services and created a very rigid and conservative system. It seems that even if a therapeutic miracle were to take place and it were outside this system, it would, in the name of science, only be criticized or condemned as quackery.
Established medicine has remained without a rival, without constructive criticism, and finally without "heart" for far too long.
Whenever a member of the medical society has tried to criticize the system from within, he or she has been ostracized or threatened with the revocation of his/her medical license; at the least, their professional standing has suffered (Confessions of a Medical Heretic: Mendelson). The hold which medical associations have on their members is formidable. Many of the medical community’s most sensitive and perceptive members have at times felt a sense of suffocation and despair at the hands of these associations.
If one observes history, one can see that as societies became more and more organized and civilized, medical systems took over and monopolized the "health" situation. Their initial goal was the protection of the health of the people, but this initial goal eventually yielded to the desire for material wealth and gain. This observation is aptly put forth in the book Pills, Profits and Politics: The Corporate Crime of the Pharmaceutical Industry.
But as countries progressed and became technologically more advanced, more and more health problems came to the forefront. In such countries as Sweden, Norway, Denmark, England and Holland alternative methods of therapy could be freely applied by people who were not medical doctors. The medical establishments of some of these countries repeatedly tried to force their governments to take action against such lay practitioners, but to no avail. In fact their efforts brought about a diametrically opposite effect; many more flocked to alternative therapies.
In this way a "free market" was created in which only the reputation and results of the practitioner mattered, not his or her credentials. It is true that because of this freedom, some health practitioners emerged who took advantage of the rela-