beliefs, he was immune to logical entreaty. After receiving Causticum he calmed down. He lost the passion and the fanatical taint. He began to think more logically; one could discuss issues with him; he became more responsive to logic and reason. Of course, his character did not change. He still felt that he was right about things, but he made such claims in a more logical, less pathological fashion.
Quite a large percentage of Causticum patients display this tendency for fanaticism and anarchism. Of course not all of them will go to extremes, but this is the direction, the idea that you see going through such individuals affected on their mental level.
The rebelliousness to authority can also be expressed in relation to work; that is, they may be averse to work and can give their superiors a lot of trouble. Causticum people can be strong and confrontational, they are often disobedient and defiant, ‘contrary’ as expressed in the proving. ‘Enraged dogmatism and inclination to quarrel’ (Hahnemann). Sometimes you also see a dictatorial attitude towards those who are under them, but usually they will confront their superiors rather than their subordinates.
It would appear that the extent of the rebelliousness depends upon whether or not the case is one of a constitutional Causticum. Those patients who simply develop a layer of Causticum symptoms will more likely display a less intense form of rebelliousness. For instance, one may see a Staphysagria patient, previously submissive and obedient, enter a Causticum state after the prescription of Staph.. As this state develops the person gradually accumulates more and more will power until eventually he or she rebels. If previously repressed, they will come to demand their rights now; e.g. an abused wife after taking Staph. will refuse to take further abuse from her husband. Of course, such a change alone does not dictate treatment (on the contrary, it is a curative development!), but if pathology exists on some level and treatment is required, such a character