Books

The Celle Seminars_Page 177

Celle Seminar I, Case 5: Myelogenous Leukemia

(A.30): I’m almost convinced about Natrum muriaticum. If we looked closer, we might find that it is the correct remedy after all.
(G.V.): Do you mean to say that you would suggest giving Natrum muriaticum}
(A.30): Yes. He is bald on the forehead, has an enlarged spleen, has leukemia, is irritable when questioned, is a closed person, has suppressed anger, is afraid to be hurt. When you ask questions he is afraid to be hurt and then he attacks. He also likes cold baths. About his desires: he likes salty soups. He always laughs, and it seems that laughter is a device that saves him from being hurt. He laughs to defend himself from attacks. When he talks about his father he laughs. All these things fit in very well with Natrum muriaticum.
(G.V.): True, I have mentioned Natrum muriaticum before and as I said, my main objection to Natrum muriaticum is the fact that he does not behave like Natrum muriaticum; it is not simply a matter of being closed. Natrum muriaticum, if it is a closed person—which it usually is—would not have had the guts to carry on the conversation the way he did. He would be much more timid and reserved. For instance, Natrum muriaticum would not give answers that might provoke reactions, because he would be afraid of these reactions. Knowing that he is being seen by so many people, he would not dare to provoke such a reaction and say the sort of things that he said. If he were Natrum muriaticum, he would feel grieved by his father’s put downs, and he would close himself off instead of assuming this challenging attitude. We also see other examples of openness: he experimented with drugs, he had relationships with several different women. Judging from his history, he doesn’t seem to be a case of Natrum muriaticum, and his hatred is not like that seen with Natrum muriaticum.

177