Books

Homeopathy – Medicine for the New Millennium – page 29

It is a very frequent observation in homeopathic practice that the syphilitic miasm is grafted onto an organism which has already been weakened by the psoric miasm. In Aphorism 206 of the Or- ganon, Hahnemann writes:
When a physician is called to treat what he supposes to be an inveterate case of syphilis, he will usually rind that it is principally complicated with psora, because this miasm (the psoric) is by far (he most frequent and fundamental cause of chronic diseases…
In this situation, the homeopath is faced with a difficult and del- icate problem. Two specific miasmatic predispositions are pre- sent at the same time. The homeopath must be able to discern which symptoms belong to the syphilitic miasm, and remove this layer first. Only then will the symptom complex represent- ing the psoric miasm become clear. Each miasm is represent- ed by a set of symptoms. Therefore, the homeopath must rec- ognize among the totality of symptoms those complexes which belong to each miasm. Obviously, this is a painstaking process, demanding extraordinary skill and knowledge on the part of the prescriber and a great deal of patience on the part of the patient.
Hahnemann also identified a third miasm, which he labelled the psychotic miasm. This arises from a certain type of gonorrhea which has the peculiarity of developing warts in its secondary stage. ‘The miasm of the other common gonorrhoeas’, Hahne- mann writes, ‘seems not to penetrate the whole organism, but only locally stimulate the urinary organs.’
The homeopath confronted with a case in which all three mi- asms are present can remove them one by one – not simultane- ously. Remedies prescribed must follow each other in a particu- lar sequence depending upon the prominence of a particular mi- asm at any particular moment in time. This demands the homeo- path’s constant attention, continuous study, and careful re-evalu- ation of the symptoms appearing during various phases of treat- ment; only their correct assess-ment will enable the prescriber to choose the right remedy in the right dose at the right time.
Unfortunately, in our time the task is even greater than it was in Hahnemann’s time. There are in fact many more than three mi- asms. Modern homeopathic experience identifies a wide varie-