Books

Homeopathy – Medicine for the New Millennium – page 24

many patients subsequently returned with a new complaint, or a relapse of the old one. It was in Hahnemann’s nature to ask why and to probe until he had found the answer. In his Chronic Dis- eases, he writes:
Whence then this…unfavorable result of the continued treatment of the…chronic diseases even by Homeopathy? What was the reason [forl the thousands of unsuccessful endeavors to heal… diseases of a chronic nature so that lasting health might result? Might this be caused, perhaps, by the still too small number of Homeopathic remedies that have so far been proved as to their pure action? … Even the new additions of proved valuable medicines, increasing from year to year, have not advanced the healing of chronic diseases by a single step, while acute diseases are not only passably removed, by means of a correct application of Homeopathic remedies but with the assistance of the never-resting preservative vital in our organism, find a speedy and complete cure.
Hahnemann saw time and again chronic diseases removed homeopathic ally only to return in a more or less varied form and with new symptoms. He saw that the homeopathic physician, presented with a chronic case,
…has not only to combat the disease presented before his eyes… but that he has always to encounter some separate fragment of a more deep-seated original disease… He, therefore, must first find out as far as possible the whole extent of all the accidents and symptoms belonging to the unknown primitive malady before he can hope to discover one or more medicines which may homeopathically cover the whole of the original disease.
To Hahnemann, it gradually became clear that such chronic con- ditions cannot be cured by the vital force alone, nor by any ma- nipulation of diet or life habits. He then launched into exhaustive inquiries of all such chronic cases to see if any common denom- inator could be found to explain the deep and invisible weak- ness which predisposed to their chronic condition – a weakness which Hahnemann termed ‘miasm’. By 1827, when Hahnemann had studied this problem for about twelve years, he became con- vinced that he had found the common denominator. His condi- tion was based upon two related observations. Hahnemann de- scribes the first observation in the following passage: