Books

Homeopathy – Medicine for the New Millennium – page 7

laria to the fact that it was bitter. Hahnemann was so dissatisfied with this explanation that he did something very extraordinary: he took a series of doses of Peruvian Bark himself! This was an action entirely unprecedented in the medical world of his time. It is not known to this day what prompted him to do such a thing, but his experiment led to an entirely new era of medicine. He de- scribes the result as follows:
I took by way of experiment, twice a day, four drachms of good China. My feet, finger ends, etc., at first became cold; I grew languid and drowsy; then my heart began to palpitate, and my pulse grew hard and small; intolerable anxiety, trembling, prostration throughout all my limbs; then pulsation in my head, redness of my cheeks, thirst, and, in short, all these symptoms, which are ordinarily characteristic of intermittent fever, made their appearance, one after the other, yet without the peculiar chilly, shivering rigor.
Briefly, even those symptoms which are of regular occurrence and especially characteristic – as the stupidity of mind, the kind of rigidity in all the limbs, but above all the numb, disagreeable sensation, which seems to have its seat in the periosteum, over every bone in the body – all these make their appearance. This paroxysm lasted two or three hours each time, and recurred if I repeated this dose, not otherwise; I discontinued it, and was in good health.3
Imagine the astounding revelation that struck Hahnemann as a result of this experiment! The standard medical assumption had always been that if the body produces a symptom, a medi- cine must be given to relieve that symptom. This was so deep- ly ingrained that it had almost become an automatic reflex in the mind of doctor and patient. But here, in his own personal experi- ence, Hahnemann found that a drug which was known to be cu- rative in malaria actually produces those very symptoms when given to a healthy person!
Many would simply have ignored such an observation as a mere exception. Hahnemann, however, was a true empirical scientist. To him, the observation itself was what counted regardless of whether it fitted neatly into current dogma or not. He accepted the observation and went on to make further experiments which fur- ther proved this ‘chance’ observation as a fact of Nature: A sub-