Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 284

direction. After such a positive response, the equilibrium attained within the organ- ism can be expected to last for a long time
– say, from six months to many years. The patient will very likely not require further prescriptions for a very long time. Another follow-up visit should be held within an- other month, but there is every reason for expecting the amelioration to continue. If

this turns out to be indeed true, later visits could be spaced out to every three months, every six months, and eventually every year. Of course, the patient should always be instructed that if any relapse occurs, or if intercurrent illnesses happen, earlier vis- its are encouraged. Nevertheless, it can be expected that any further ailments will be of a relatively minor nature.

INTENSITY
OF SYMPTOMS

OR INTENSITY
OF
SYMPTOMS

REMEDY

TIME PERIOD

E M/E CC

1 MONTH

REMEDY

TIME PERIOD

E M/E CC

1 MONTH
Figure 17:

CASE II:
Patient: “I feel very much better.”
Case: Marked amelioration with little or no aggravation. Better in every respect- chief complaint, energy, mentally/emotion- ally.
Interpretation: 1) Precise simillimum

and exact potency in a case with no patho- logical changes, or 2) case was already severely aggravated at the outset (severe chronic case, or an acute case). Good prog- nosis in both instances.
Prescription: Wait

CASE II:

This circumstance is very similar to the previous one. Here, a dramatic amelioration is observed with no (or an unnoticeable) aggravation in the beginning. A careful review of all symptoms and their changes throughout the month confirms this report.
In such a case, the remedy was a perfect match to the resonant frequency of the patient, and moreover the chosen potency was as nearly perfect as can ever be expected. It may have been that the optimal potency for the patient was 195c, and a 200 was given. In such a perfect prescription, amelioration occurs without any significant aggravation. Again, the “second prescription” will then be to wait for a very long time (perhaps years) before giving another remedy.
Another interpretation of this circumstance may be that the patient’s condition was already aggravated to its maximum prior to the remedy. This means that the defense mechanism was at its highest pitch of activity before the medicine was administered. The correct remedy therefore simply produced an imperceptible aggravation followed by an amelioration. Such a cir- cumstance is quite rare, but it can occur in chronic cases suffering very extremely at the outset of treatment. It is also commonly observed during acute ailments; this is the reason why it is usually said that aggravations are virtually never observed in acute illnesses