Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 233

then the prescriber must be completely certain that the new symptom image has fully emerged and achieved stability.
In such very difficult cases, it may be necessary to use a series of two or three different remedies in fairly quick succession, but they must always be prescribed only upon a full totality of symptoms. Any shortcuts or hasty prescriptions carry the very real risk of delaying the ultimate cure of the case by several months or more.
Deep miasmatic cases, in the process of treatment, may develop a variety of problems on the physical level on the way toward cure. In- stead of skin eruptions or discharges, they may develop arthritic prob- lems or headaches, or digestive disturbances. Again, the same prin- ciple applies. These sufferings should be prescribed for only if they become intolerable, and only then if the remedy image has matured and stabilized.
The principle of progress from a more important organ to a less im- portant organ, in patients with deep miasmatic predispositions, pres- ents great difficulty. In terms of location, the direction may be clearly favorable, but the intensity of suffering is likely to be very great. The patient, involved in his or her own present condition, may be inclined to complain that the new state of suffering is even greater than the one prior to taking the remedy. If the direction is beneficial, however, this statement should be vieved with suspicion. Ultimately, the homeopath may test this judgment on the part of the patient by threatening the possibility of antidoting the remedy by giving allopathic drugs. Usu- ally, the patient will emphatically refuse such an option, realizing that in actual fact the present state of suffering is not as severe as the origi- nal one.
In patients belonging to the second category, it is unusual to see old symptoms return within the early months of treatment. Whenever they do return, they occur with a great deal of violence, and they do not ordinarily return in the original image. As usual in these unfortunate cases, one must exhaust the endurance of the patient while waiting for the emergence of a clear symptom picture. As soon as a stable image reveals itself, however, the new remedy must be given.
Deep miasmatic patients frequently arrive at a stage in which a no- sode or a characteristic miasmatic remedy is clearly indicated by the symptomatology. Whenever this occurs, even if it is only a week after the last medicine, the remedy should be given, and progress can be expected to ensue. Further medicines will be needed as well, but one should keep an eye out for the miasmatic nosode or remedy.
In deep cases, a new set of symptoms usually means that a new drug is required. Therefore, one cannot say that there is a “constitutional”