Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 230

curative response to the first medicine later suffers a relapse because of an antidoting influence. This might occur because of taking allopathic drugs for some minor complaint, drinking coffee, or undergoing den- tal treatment. After such interferences, the patient’s condition may ap- pear to be returning to a relapsed state, but it is nevertheless important to wait 15 days or so (after discontinuing the antidoting influence). Usually, the defense mechanism is strong enough to handle the distur- bance on its own without further homeopathic treatment. If, however, the relapse does seem to establish itself over a significant period of time, the case should be retaken. If the same remedy is still indicated, it should be given in the same potency and not higher. The reason for this is that the first remedy was antidoted. Therefore, one cannot know whether the original potency was truly optimal; for this reason, one must again try the same potency level.
Skin eruptions may well occur in such patients within the first 20 or more days. If such eruptions (or discharges) are accompanied by a general amelioration of the patient, one should not administer another prescription. This is a classic example of symptoms moving to the periphery on the way toward cure, and nothing should be done to interfere with the process.
If the eruption were to occur much later, say, after six months or one year, however, another remedy should be given. Usually, either the same remedy or a complementary one will be indicated, but one must not be in a hurry to prescribe. If the image is not yet clear, allow more time to pass to become perfectly sure of the next prescription. A hasty prescription at this stage could confuse the case and delay the cure of the eruption.
A similar eventuality might occur in a patient initially displaying severe mental problems – say, depression. After the first remedy, the mental state dramatically clears up, but the patient then experiences a severe gastritis. If this occurs within several days of the first prescrip- tion, then it is very probable that it is a curative response, and it should be allowed to run its course. This would be a typical example of cure proceeding from “within outward” in a very strong constitution. If, however, the gastritis were to occur a few months or a year after the original prescription, it will most likely require a new prescription – again, most probably a repeat of the original “constitution” remedy or a complementary.
It may occur that a patient belonging to this first category will demonstrate the Hering’s Law principle of amelioration proceeding from above downward. This might involve a skin eruption clearing first upon the head, then the chest, and finally the palms or feet. Or, it