Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 221

correct new medicine at the appropriate moment, which may be within even a few days of the original prescription. Such aggravations are very difficult to manage, occurring usually in hospitalized patients; it is unlikely that a beginning prescriber would be confronted with such a situation. Nevertheless, every prescriber should be aware of the pos- sibility.
The disease cholera offers a good analogy. Most infectious diseases create a reaction on the part of the defense mechanism which mani- fests as high fever, malaise, muscle aches, anorexia, and various other symptoms. In cholera, the defensive reaction itself becomes severe enough to actually kill the patient; it is not the microorganism which causes death, but rather the severe diarrhea (and resulting dehydra- tion) designed to eliminate the bacteria from the system. This is why allopathic treatment for cholera saves lives – not by giving an anti- biotic, but by providing intravenous feeding to counteract fluid loss. Once the defensive reaction is ended, intravenous fluids are stopped and the patient returns to normal. In this instance, it is the overactiv- ity of the defensive mechanism which can lead to death. The same is true of a severe homeopathic aggravation in a constitutionally weak and deeply pathological patient. If such a reaction occurs, the correct remedy given at the precisely appropriate time can enable the defense mechanism to more efficiently bring about health, but a policy of wait- ing unnecessarily long in regard to the pace of the case could possibly lead to pathological damage.
Such severe aggravations, however, occur only in highly unusual circumstances which are unlikely to be tackled by beginning prescrib- ers anyway. For routine cases seen daily in the office, the homeopathic aggravation cannot do significant damage. Such responses, therefore, should not be feared or avoided but rather welcomed. Whenever pos- sible, choosing a more comfortable potency at the outset might reduce the severity of the reaction, but a particular remedy should never be selected merely in order to prevent a homeopathic aggravation. On the contrary, an aggravation is an encouraging sign that the medicine is acting and that the patient is on the road toward cure.

Evaluation at One Month

The first situation requiring great understanding by the homeopath occurs during the one-month follow-up visit. The first and most im- portant task is to interpret correctly what effect the first prescription has really had. As has been discussed, this is no easy task. In the first place, the reliability of the information must be correctly established.