Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 220

cases, homeopathic aggravations are desirable. The common practice of some homeopaths, therefore, to try to suppress aggravations is actu- ally a process which prevents cure. Attitudes and teachings based on prescribing remedies which are unlikely to produce aggravations come from people who have understood very little of the science of home- opathy.
Homeopathic patients many times are surprised when they call their homeopath to report an initial aggravation of their symptoms, and the homeopath replies, “That is a good sign. I am pleased.” Of course, homeopaths are not callous. They do not wish to inflict unnecessary suffering. Insofar as it is possible, everything is done to reduce the severity and the length of homeopathic aggravations, but always the basic laws of healing must be observed. Even though it may appear cruel on the part of the prescriber, anything less is actually performing a disservice to the patient, because the patient’s suffering will ulti- mately be prolonged because of lack of cure.
In the vast majority of patients, the homeopathic aggravation can- not be considered harmful. The defense mechanism always, obeys the fundamental principle of cybernetics, which states that any highly or- ganized system will react to any stress with the best possible response of which it is capable at any given moment. That is why if there is a pathological symptom which can cause damage to the system, such as very high blood pressure, this dangerous symptom will be immedi- ately ameliorated while other symptoms may be aggravated during the therapeutic crisis. This is a very important principle to keep in mind while interpreting responses to medicines.
A major circumstance in which remedy aggravations can be harm- ful is repetition of a remedy which is not well indicated. If the prescrib- er misinterprets the response of the patient and continues to repeat the medicine, the defense mechanism can become overstimulated, and eventually damage can occur. Ordinarily, this requires a truly exces- sive repetition, and would be likely to occur only by the most thought- less prescribing, but it is at least a theoretical possibility.
Another circumstance in which one must be cautious about ho- meopathic aggravations is in serious pathological cases with severely weakened constitutional power. In such cases, actual cure is possible, since there is enough strength to produce an aggravation, but this re- quires the utmost skill and experience on the part of the homeopath to manage. It is in this circumstance that good allopathic knowledge is important to homeopathic prescribers; in such serious cases, it is nec- essary that the homeopath be able to determine when a case is develop- ing serious pathological change. One must then enter quickly with the