Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 209

ing high potencies. Medicines such as Lachesis, Aurum, and deep-act- ing nosodes (especially Medorrhinum) have strong tendencies toward physical pathology. For this reason, they should usually be restricted to lower potencies (30 or 200) unless the individual case is demonstrated to be quite free of physical pathology.
Finally, a few guidelines should be given for prescribing in acute cases. In general, the same principles apply, but repetition may have to be more frequent if the remedy action is quickly exhausted. In chil- dren with acute ailments (because their defense mechanisms are quite strong), it is best not to give potencies lower than 200; thus 200 to CM potencies can be given, depending upon the certainty of the medicine for the acute ailment. If the patient is elderly, chronically weakened, or even if severely weakened by the acute ailment (for example, if it has developed into a severe pneumonia), a 200 potency would be prefer- able for the initial prescription, even if the remedy is quite obvious.
Even in acute ailments, one dose of the remedy should be given, and then the effect observed. If a lower potency has been given, it is possible that its effect will be exhausted in a matter of a few hours, in which case another dose should be given. This should not be done rou- tinely, however; the case should be retaken to be certain that a differ- ent remedy is not needed. It is common practice in some homeopathic circles to routinely prescribe an automatic program of repetitions in acute cases (say, one dose every hour for six doses). Although such a practice probably does little harm, it is also usually unnecessary. If the remedy is clear and a high potency can be given, one dose usually will suffice; even if a repetition is needed, the case should be re-taken to determine if a new prescription is necessary.

Single Remedy

One of the most fundamental principles of homeopathy is that of prescribing only one remedy at a time. This is such an obvious prin- ciple that it applies to every healing practice.
If more than one remedy (or therapeutic technique) is prescribed, any beneficial or adverse effects cannot possibly be evaluated with ac- curacy. There can be no way to decide which of the components of a combination has acted. In addition, no one can possibly predict the interactions which might occur between a combination of therapeutic influences. If a particular medicine acts in a particular manner when given singly, who can say what it might do after being altered in an unpredictable way by a combination?
Suppose a patient is given a combination of six different homeo-