Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 208

ing of a skin eruption on the hands of three-year duration. As you take the case, you discover that she has had very few other problems, and that she is quite free in her life-expression. She is quite creative, she enjoys her work, she has enjoyed traveling in various cultures, she has deep friendships, and she is not obstructed in the sexual sphere. The homeopathic information leads to a very clear picture of Pulsatilla, and your observation of the patient confirms this impression. In such a case, you could easily prescribe Pulsatilla 50M or even CM with con- fidence.
On the other hand, another young person comes to you with a simi- lar complaint, but you cannot decide whether she needs Pulsatilla or Sulphur. You finally decide upon Pulsatilla after many hours of careful study; in this instance, you would tend to give only a 30 or a 200 for the initial prescription because of the lack of clarity.
In still another case with a skin eruption, you may see clearly that Pulsatilla is indicated. Yet the patient reports that she is able to keep her skin eruption under control by using cortisone ointment “only” twice a week. Further, you observe that there are other weaknesses of the organism – a weak vitality, the patient is easily tired, easily affected by chemicals in the environment. In this type of case, you would not give a potency higher than 200; otherwise, you may witness an unnec- essarily prolonged aggravation.
It is sometimes said that high potencies are for cases in whom the center of gravity is on the mental level, whereas lower potencies are reserved for cases centered on the physical plane. This point of view is false. It is true that mental symptoms are the most important in select- ing a medicine; if they give a clear and obvious indication for a rem- edy, even though the physical symptoms may not match so perfectly, then a high potency can be given – because there is a high degree of certainty about the remedy, and not because it is a mental case. Anoth- er case with many mental symptoms which do not fit clearly into any particular remedy will be given a lower potency because the remedy is not clear.
Another mistaken idea is that no harm can be done if a beginning prescriber restricts potencies to below 30. As previously mentioned, any potency can have profound actions depending upon the similarity of the medicine to the patient. If the remedy is the simillimum, even a crude dose or a very low potency can have profound effect; indeed, if it is originally a poisonous substance and it closely matches the resonant frequency of an oversensitive patient, a lower potency can produce a severe and dangerous aggravation.
There are a few remedies which one should be cautious about giv-