Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 202

may be present to enable the prescriber to give it. Such a judgment is, of course, quite delicate and requires some experience, but it should be considered.

Very often, it will be found that a particular remedy runs through all rubrics except, say, the third and the fifth (as listed in order of im- portance); the first and most important symptoms are covered, as well as some lesser symptoms, but a few in the middle are not. If the rest of the repertorization has not produced an obvious solution, such a remedy should also be considered. It should be compared with any peculiar symptoms, and then carefully studied in the materia medicas. Since there are many uncertainties involved in case-taking, in the list- ing and grading of symptoms, and also in the recording of provings into the Repertory, it is frequently found that the simillimum will not cover all the important symptoms in a case. In such a circumstance, careful questioning about the missing symptoms should be made on follow-up visits to ascertain whether they are cured as part of a cure of the whole patient; if so, and if confirmed in other patients, that remedy may be added to the rubric as having produced a “cured symptom,”

Using this tedious and painstaking procedure, the homeopath will steadily add to his or her knowledge of materia medica. After 10 years or so of practice, the homeopath will evolve to the point where the label “beginner” is no longer appropriate. As more and more experi- ence is gained, the process of repertorization may be streamlined a bit by doing an “elimination” procedure. This modification should be undertaken only after the homeopath has gained an extensive knowl- edge of materia medica, because it distinctly reduces the opportunity to consider all possible remedies.

“Elimination” repertorization is done by first constructing a very carefully considered list of major symptoms. The most characteristic symptoms are pulled out and arranged according to their importance. This must be done with extreme care, taking into account a variety of factors: the severity of the symptom, its hierarchical level, how strong- ly it represents the essential pathology of the patient, its timing in rela- tion to the evolution of the current pathology, etc.

The first symptom in such a list is then written down, and all rem- edies shown in that rubric are written on a sheet of paper, including the grading of each remedy. The second symptom is then written down, but this time only those medicines contained in the second rubric as well as in the first are written down. Drugs which are not present in the first rubric, but which are in the second, are eliminated. Next, the third symptom is noted down, and only those remedies included in it as well as in the previous rubrics are recorded. Finally, at the end of this