Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 200

Occasionally (not often), the initial case is very obvious. The pa- tient presents with a few simple complaints, the homeopathic image clearly fits a particular remedy, a few peculiar symptoms confirm that remedy, and no symptoms contraindicate it. Such a situation is obvi- ous, and the prescriber can give the remedy with confidence. Even relatively inexperienced prescribers will see dramatic results when the initial image is clear and obvious. It is then very important to wait for a long time before either repeating the remedy or giving another one.

The more common circumstance, however, is a mixture of symp- tom pictures. A patient, for example, may present a highly characteris- tic mental symptom of Pulsatilla, and the prescriber naturally tends to believe that Pulsatilla will be the remedy. Upon further inquiry howev- er, it turns out that virtually no other symptoms confirm Pulsatilla, and furthermore the patient is very chilly and desires fat (two symptoms which directly go against Pulsatilla). In such a circumstance, the ho- meopath must definitely not yield to the temptation to give Pulsatilla. More thought and study need be done to find a remedy that truly cov- ers the totality of the symptoms. Every symptom may not be covered, but a remedy will hopefully be found which clearly covers the bulk of the most important symptoms.

In the beginning, it often happens that a seemingly confusing and unrelated collection of symptoms seems to fit no remedy at all sim- ply because of the lack of knowledge of the prescriber. Someone with greater knowledge and experience may well see the correct remedy without difficulty. But what is the beginner to do in such a circum- stance?

The best procedure is to “repertorize” the case. A careful list of the patient’s symptoms is made according to procedures given in Chapter

13. Great thought should be applied to the choice of the symptoms to be used in repertorization, and then care should be taken to arrange them in their true order of importance.

To begin with, the very peculiar symptoms (those showing only a few remedies in the Repertory) should be excluded from the formal repertorization.

Then, beginning with the symptom at the top of the list, the homeo- path writes on a sheet of paper every remedy listed in the correspond- ing rubric, including the correct grading of each remedy. This is done for each of the significant symptoms in the totality. Every remedy is included so as to reduce the chances of missing the true one (assuming that correct rubrics are chosen). Finally, notations are made of every remedy which ‘’runs through” all of the rubrics.

In the ideal circumstance, such a repertorization will yield only