Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 174

asked to determine its validity: “How strong is this craving?” “How often do you experience it?” “How difficult would it be for you to give them up?” “Can you give an example of circumstances when you most notice this craving?”

Hypothetical questions should also be avoided. For example, no useful information would come from a question of the following type: “Would you be irritable if you were late for an appointment, your car stalled while waiting for an unexpectedly long train at a train crossing, and the kids in the back seat were screaming and hitting each other?” Such a question would not provide any information truly expressive of the defense mechanism of the patient.

Sometimes the patient has no particular answer to give to the initial purposely nondirective question. Suppose the interviewer asks, “Do you have any fears or phobias?” The patient responds, “Not that I can recall.” Because of the totality of the rest of the symptoms, suppose the interviewer specifically wants to know if the patient has a fear of heights. It would be improper to ask directly, “Do you have a fear of heights?” because the patient may infer that the interviewer is seeking an affirmative answer. Instead, the interviewer might give a variety of possibilities just to aid the patient’s memory, such as, “Well, for exam- ple, do you have a fear of the dark, of being alone, of heights, of thun- derstorms, of dogs, or any others?” Suppose the patient then responds, “Oh yes! I have always had a strong fear of heights! I just always avoid them.” Such a response can be trusted because it was elicited among a variety of other possibilities presented with equal emphasis.

Important symptoms should not be left at simple face value. They should be probed further to be certain that the true picture is present- ed. For example, a patient may be asked, “Do you tend to be unusually fastidious or sloppy?” The patient replies, “Oh, I am quite sloppy.” But if the question is further asked, “How do others see you in this regard?” the patient may well reply, “Very neat!” The fastidious patient is never quite satisfied and therefore sees himself as sloppy.

When a patient presents a particular symptom, it is advisable to write it down and then leave a space below it. One must not interrupt the patient merely to fill in the clarifications and modifications. Instead, a space is left, and this information is filled in later after the patient has run out of things to say. With certain patients, of course, particularly those who seem to enjoy rambling on about anything com- ing to mind, it may be necessary to interrupt from time to time in order to return to relevant topics. But even in such a situation, interruptions should be made only reluctantly, because there is always a chance that such ramblings may bring out clues to an important symptom.