Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 172

Bringing forth these deep symptoms is a very delicate matter in- deed. The first clue of their presence may be revealed by a mere ten- sion, or hesitation, or gesture, or cracking of the voice. Because walls have been erected around these sore spots, the patient will quickly attempt to skip over such symptoms and to move on to other less pain- ful things. The interviewer must be quite sensitive to this dynamic. In our normal cultural context, there are innumerable subtle signals (nonverbal or verbal) which we use to warn others not to trespass into a “private” area. Much of this communication is done subliminally. The homeopathic interviewer, however, must become skilled in picking up these signals. Perhaps the best way is to be sensitive to one’s own de- gree of emotional tension. If, during the course of an interview, the homeopath experiences discomfort about a particular topic (provided, of course, that this is not merely a tender spot for the homeopath him- self), this area should be further explored, gently and sensitively, but resolutely.

Homeopaths are as human as everyone else; therefore, they want to be liked and respected by their patients. This motivation in itself can prevent the homeopath from probing into tender areas. If there is a sensitive area, the homeopath has a responsibility to the patient to non- judgmentally and carefully encourage him or her to openly describe this symptom. Often even the gentlest probing into such realms will cause the patient to break down and weep, or to become agitated or angry. If symptoms are expressed with such emotional charge attached to them, their expression is beneficial to the patient and of great value to the homeopath. In these moments, the patient’s guard is down, and whatever expression occurs is deep and essential to the case.

To some, this approach may be reminiscent of the cathartic method of a psychoanalytic interview. It is true that the skill involved in a homeopathic interview is superficially akin to that necessary in psy- choanalysis, but the purpose of eliciting the symptoms is quite differ- ent. In homeopathy, these symptoms are brought out for the purpose of understanding deeply the true pathology, the precise way in which the defense mechanism is acting, and therefore of finding the most appropriate remedy that may lead to cure. A psychoanalyst, upon dis- covering such an important thought, feeling, or experience, will tend to pursue it further in an analytical manner. The homeopath, on the other hand, once satisfied that the symptom is elicited, will move on to other symptoms.