Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 167

ink, paint it on the wall, put an index finger to it. One of the most important things is to keep out of the mind, in an examination of the case, some other case that has appeared to be similar. If this is not done the mind will be prejudiced in spite of your best endeavours. I have to fight that with every fresh case I come to. I have to labor to keep myself from thinking about thing 1 have cured like that before, because it would prejudice my mind.2

 

In listening actively to the patient, the homeopath’s imagination and sensitivity must be highly involved. The homeopath must develop the capacity to live the experience of the patient. This is not merely a mat- ter of putting oneself into the shoes of the patient, but rather one of perceiving the patient’s experience in his or her own context. Since it is obviously impossible for anyone to actually experience the full range of expressions seen during even one day of homeopathic prescribing, it is necessary for the homeopath to suspend personal prejudices, and in imagination to crawl into the context of each patient in order to live that experience, if even for a moment.

The patient may describe a symptom foreign to the personal expe- rience of the homeopath – for example, fear experienced in a crowd. The homeopath must actively wonder, What is this? Is it a feeling of oppression or suffocation because of the closeness of the atmosphere? Is it a fear that someone might cause bodily harm? Is it a fear of not be- ing able to escape in case of some imagined disaster? Is it an emotional vulnerability to the sufferings sensed from those in the crowd? Is it a sensation of loss of personal identity while being merged with the identity of the crowd as a single entity? From such internal imaginings, the homeopath will be able to frame questions which will elucidate more precisely the exact meaning of this symptom to the patient. By living the symptom in this manner, the homeopath is also conveying to the patient that he is truly interested and that he can actually under- stand even the most intimate of the patient’s experiences or thoughts.

This process is identical with the process involved in studying ma- teria medica. At first, when one approaches materia medica, one be- comes frustrated over the overwhelming mass of seemingly unrelated data. But if each symptom is approached in the same way described above, gradually the remedy is experienced as an integrated, living entity. Each symptom should be read with great interest and solemnity; imagination must be brought into play so that the actual experience of the symptom and of the remedy can be lived. How does the experi- ence of this symptom relate to the others? What must that be like?

 

2. J. T. Kent, Lectures on Homeopathic Philosophy, p. 232.