Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 159

succussions have a constant effect at different dilutions, or does the effect vary for different dilutions? Are there different effects below Avogadro’s number, especially when appreciable amounts of the origi- nal substance are still present, or is the ratio of original substance to solvent irrelevant? Anyway, for the present, the only way of resolving this issue is by the clinical experience of the most astute observers in homeopathy; at the present time, the issue is still unresolved.

By convention and habit arising out of experience, there are certain potencies which are used routinely in homeopathy: 2x, 6x, 12x, 30c, 200c, 1000c, 10,000, 50,000c. For ease in communication, the “c” is deleted when describing potencies from 30c and above; thus we refer to a “200th potency” rather than saying “20oc.” Also, because some of the higher numbers are unwieldy, we adopt roman numeral designa- tions: 1000 becomes a 1M, a 10,000 potency becomes a 10M, a 50,000 potency is a 50M, 100,000 is called CM, and so on. The “M” is desig- nated as a capital letter in this book to differentiate it from “m,” which means “50-millesimal” scale of potentization. There do exist poten- cies called ultra-high potencies which go to MM (1,000,000c), 50MM (50,000,000c), CMM (100,000,000c), MMM (1,000,000,000c), etc. In addition, a homeopath may rarely give an unusual potency for certain reasons – such as a 17x, a 500c, etc.

As mentioned in Chapter 7, Avogadro’s number corresponds in di- lution to a 24x, which is a 12c or between a 5m and 6m. This means that beyond this point, there is no longer any molecule of the original substance remaining. Thus, potencies of 10M or MMM are astronomi- cally far beyond any possibility of maintaining any chemical effect of the original substance. The fact that the energy, or vibration rate, of the original substance is transferred to the solvent molecules was discussed in Chapter 7.

Hahnemann, being a chemist, was well aware of Avogadro’s num- ber, but it is indicative of the openness of his mind and his emphasis or empirical observation that he went ahead anyway and used potencies that exceeded Avogadro’s number – and he found them to be increas- ingly effective with fewer adverse effects than lower potencies. At this point, however, many of Hahnemann’s followers could not follow him. Their belief was strongly grounded in the materialistic philosophy emerging at the time, so they found it inconceivable that medicines could act beyond the material level. This caused a major split in ho- meopathic circles, which eventually became called the split between low potency and high potency prescribers. (Generally, low potencies are remedies below Avogadro’s number, and high potencies are con- sidered those above it).