Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 108

potent that those in Hahnemann’s time. Drugs of all types, of course, are damaging, but in my experience the most disturbing to the organ- ism are antibiotics, tranquilizers, contraceptive pills, cortisone, and other hormones. In any specific individual, however, literally any drug or foreign substance can be disruptive if the person is susceptible to it. Thus, we see people having even fatal anaphylactic reactions to very minute doses of drugs such as penicillin, aspirin, and other supposedly mild drugs.

Since allopathic drugs are never selected according to the Law of Similars, they inevitably superimpose upon the organism a new drug disease which then must he counteracted by the organism. Further- more, if the drug has been successful in removing symptoms on a pe- ripheral level, the defense mechanism is then forced to reestablish a new state of equilibrium at a deeper level. In this way, the vibration rate of the organism is disturbed and weakened by two mechanisms: 1) by the influence of the drug itself and 2) by interference with the best possible response of the defense mechanism. Consequently, if the drug is powerful enough, or if drug therapy is continued long enough, the organism may jump to a deeper level in its susceptibility to disease. The real tragedy of such a consequence is that the defense mechanism of the individual cannot then reestablish the original equilibrium on its own; even with homeopathic treatment of very high quality, it may take many years to return to the original level, much less to make any progress on the original ailment.

It is a strange but true paradox that people who have been weakened by allopathic drugging become relatively “protected” from certain in- fections and epidemics. This, of course, occurs because the center of gravity of susceptibility has moved into more vital regions of the or- ganism that there is not enough susceptibility on superficial levels to produce a symptomatic reaction. In such an instance, this not a sign of improvement in health, but rather a sign of degeneration.

Let us consider the example of a person infected with syphilis. He develops a chancre on the penis, which is then treated by high doses of penicillin over a period of two weeks. The chancre disappears, and the patient is considered cured. Research and clinical experience have shown that such a patient cannot re-acquire a chancre. Such apparent “immunity” is not a sign of improved health but rather an indication of further degeneration in the ability of the defense mechanism to maintain the symptoms on more peripheral levels of the organism. From the homeopathic point of view, this is considered a suppression. The organism as a whole is suffering even more than during the initial stage of the chancre. After three to six months, however, the second-