Books

The Science of Homeopathy – page 38

The practitioner prescribes a course of therapy (whether allopathic medicine, psychotherapy, naturopathic treatments), and on the return visit discovers that the asthma and constipation have been ameliorated satisfactorily, while the symptoms of irritability and anxiety have in- creased. The patient complains of sadness, and his mental state ex- hibits further deterioration in his power to concentrate; his ability to perform creative work for himself or others is lessened to a noticeable degree. The orthodox allopathic doctor, focused by training on the physical level, would be likely to feel gratified by the results since the asthma and constipation have improved, and then refer the patient to a psychiatrist to handle the “new” psychological problems. A practitio- ner who understands the principles of the totality of the patient, how- ever, would immediately see that the center of gravity of disturbance has moved from the physical to the emotional level, thus signifying a deterioration of health in general, despite the fact that the original physical complaints may have been 90% ameliorated.

During a real cure, the exact opposite sequence of events is likely to occur. At first, the physical symptoms may remain unchanged or per- haps grow slightly worse, while the power of concentration is improved and emotional symptoms are diminished. This would mean that the center of gravity is gradually lowering in the hierarchy and concentrat- ing somewhat on the physical plane. The wise clinician would simply do nothing at this point, and on subsequent visits it will be observed that all of the symptoms, including the physical ones, have gradually disappeared. Thus by understanding the hierarchy of symptoms and observing the change in the center of gravity, we have a highly practi- cal method of evaluating progress, a method which is based moreover on the actual workings of the defense mechanism of the organism.

Throughout the presentation thus far, we have mentioned two fac- tors for consideration: the location in the hierarchy of the symptoms and their intensity. For example, two patients can have a spectrum of symptoms identical to those of the above patient, both with the same center of gravity, yet one may experience only slight impairment of his health, while the other may be severely crippled by disease. Such a difference results from the difference in intensity of symptoms. For this reason, we need a device for measuring readily both the overall degree of health of the individual, as well as a measure of the intensity of individual symptoms. Such a measure arises from the fundamental definition of health.

According to what has so far been said, it is easy to define the state of health of an individual. A comprehensive definition must fit the en- tire scope of the human being as a spiritual being. People throughout