Books

THE BERN SEMINAR-PAGE 53

danger of a relapse. The second most dangerous thing is coffee, and the third is antibiotics, especially long term; for instance, if she gets bronchitis and takes antibiotics for fifteen to twenty days, there is a very great danger that she will relapse. Actually, if she takes any drug on a daily basis, there is the possibility of a relapse. A regression would be especially regretable in her case. If the remedy is allowed to work to its potential, then she will not have too many problems in her life because the remedy is what we call constitutional. In fact, all indications for a recovery are good; it would be a pity to spoil this. Decaffeinated coffee is all right. Tea is also okay, even though it contains caffeine, because it does not have enough caffeine to bring about the kind of stimulation that coffee, which has a greater amount of caffeine, does. This is important because the antidoting effect depends on the level of caffeine in the blood. Once the level of caffeine in the blood maintains a certain high, it becomes damaging to the effect of the remedy. If you drink two or three cups of coffee a day, that is enough to keep the level of caffeine high – you are then constantly stimulated – and that is the danger. If, for instance, you drink 1/4 of a spoonful of coffee a day, it would not matter. But I do not suggest even a small amount of coffee, because once you start, you’ll quickly increase your coffee intake – 1/2 a spoonful, one spoonful, two spoonfuls, three spoonfuls, and then you’re back where you started.
(A.): If she takes a drug to stop the leukorrhea and relapses, what are the chances of successful results, if you were to re-administer the remedy after a relapse?
(G.V.): Yes, in this case there is a great possibility that the remedy would act, but there is also the possibility that the disturbance will not appear as strong. This would mean that she might regress, but that she wouldn’t necessarily suffer a complete relapse. This is precisely where you’ll run into problems: Thinking that this is already a relapse, you repeat the remedy and find that it does not act; so then you go on to some other remedy: »oh, Baryta carbonica does not act, she probably needs Phosphorus now.« You give Phosphorus and it does not act; then you give Cal-carea and it also does not act, etc. Then you become confused, and the case becomes confused. Eventually you go back to the original state of Baryta carbonica, wondering why it, and all the other remedies you tried, didn’t work. I have seen cases like this spoiled because the patient did not adhere to the precautions necessary to avoid a relapse. In cases like this, if the patient behaves correctly, the remedy will last a long time. I saw this