Books

A New Model For Health And Disease – Page 184

ence, competition and so on that society has not only allowed but promoted.
The average person cannot imagine the pharmaceutical companies’ wealth and power, growing ever more with each new turn of profit. They tell us that the billions of dollars in profit are in return given back to society through research. When has a pharmaceutical company ever given money for promoting research that was outside its own narrow interests? When has their research ever proven to be of any lasting value? The above rationale, justifying their profits, is only an excuse; the facts are that these companies use profits for power and control.
Medical history has shown us that there has been a long series of discoveries of new drugs which were first presented as "wonders" and "miracle drugs" and soon proved to have devastatingly harmful side effects. The scenario has become almost stereotypical. A drug is first promoted as a breakthrough in scientific research; a certain time period elapses where its real side effects became apparent; and not long after that it is proclaimed a menace to health, a carcinogen, an extremely hazardous drug.
Was there ever any substantial amount of money given by any large pharmaceutical company to promote research on alternative therapeutic systems?
The public should read such books as Milton Silverman’s Pills, Profits and Politics, Ivan Illich’s Medical Nemesis, Martin’s Hazards of Medication, and Braithwaite’s Corporate Crime in the Pharmaceutical Industry.
Greed and irresponsibility have not only affected the pharmaceutical companies and their directors or promoters, but society as a whole at every level, whether related to medicine or not.
We are using the pharmaceutical industry and its invisible "branches" as a paradigm, because of the main theme of this book, but I feel that every one of us must bear a share of the responsibility for the deterioration of our society as a whole.
The way pharmaceutical companies promote and market a drug is irresponsible, but who can claim that he has never been irresponsible in the basic issues of life, such as raising children, reacting to a dispute with a neighbor over property, dealing with a job, etc. Society cannot put the blame on pharmaceutical companies or homosexuals or promiscuity per se, because all are products of our way of life.