Books

A New Model For Health And Disease – Page 126

instance, why is it that when you overexert yourself a common cold or influenza may develop? In order to provide the virus with the opportunity to thrive, one has to stress the organism to produce the appropriate chemical changes.
Such ideas are common and almost universally accepted today, yet they have not been applied to research or therapeutics and are either ignored or misinterpreted.
Everybody is trying to find out where the AIDS virus has come from, and nobody seems to realize that it might have been with us all along, the only difference being that now the conditions are ripe for infection within millions of organisms.
Today we see the disease in its epidemic form simply because a great number of organisms have been undermined through venereal diseases, drugs and general pollution, so that their immune systems have become incapable of combating the virus.
From the knowledge we have today on the mutation of microorganisms under stress (chemical changes within the body), we may deduce that the virus could have sprung from an endogenous process of constant mutations of different micro¬organisms.
In the early stages of the AIDS epidemic, there was already a great number of humans who automatically manifested the virus through a series of mutations because of a great predispo¬sition towards this virus. These human organisms then became the potential sources of infection for other humans who were similarly prepared to accept the virus.
The live organism is in a dynamic state which accepts change, be it large or small. It is in a state where an electron can move between orbits and therefore disappear or reappear, determining whether the organism will be thrown off balance or will remain in balance. For example, how many times during the day does your mood change? When you are in a bad, depressed or anxious mood, there are deep changes within your system that fluctuate according to your external and internal conditions. It is obvious that your mood not only changes temporarily but also for longer periods of time and may, depending on the stress, change permanently. In the case of chronic depression we may say that the electron which formerly maintained the balance is

The Defense System 127
gone for good and consequently, the organism has jumped to a different reality in relation to its energy state.
When something of this nature occurs in the organism, then we can conclude that it has suddenly changed levels in a manner which can be understood only as an energy change or a quantum jump.
The organism always seems to hesitate as to which way it should go. Depending on several parameters, there is a choice of different probabilities which the organism may follow given different stresses (theory of uncertainty).5
Perhaps such a state is more easily understood when we examine the cases where weather changes trigger a better or worse state of health. We can all accept that electrical potentials of the atmosphere affect human organisms, and there are many individual cases which suffer intensely from these barometric changes.
31. Diseases are nothing but the activation and consequent manifestation of the existing predispositions in response to stress.
So far we have arrived logically at the conclusion that for diseases to manifest, they must have an underlying, continuing cause which is not the bacteria, virus or fungus, but the deep-seated predisposition of the organism. Bacteria or viruses will appear as soon as the internal conditions of the organism change; in this manner the organism becomes an ideal breeding ground for them.
Even if the appropriate bacteria or virus is not present, they can still manifest (in the organism) through a series of mutations from similar preexisting microorganisms.
If this hypothesis is true, the whole concept and cornerstone belief of classical medicine—that bacteria, viruses, fungi, etc., are the causes of disease—will collapse.
This assumption has great repercussions therapeutically and also for research because there is an enormous difference be¬tween "killing" the invading organisms—something that allopathic medicine tries to do—and maintaining the defense system in the best possible condition, as suggested by the Model.
This cornerstone idea of "killing the invader" put forth by established medicine has been so entrenched in our way of

128 A New Model For Health and Disease
thinking that changing it borders on the heretical. Yet unless we decide to really look at the facts with an open mind and a sincere desire to understand what is going on, we will never solve the riddle of these vicious epidemics. Today, the worst of these epidemics is called AIDS; tomorrow some other name may take precedence.
I do believe that if we carry on in the same way and continue using such large quantities of strong chemicals, new epidemics worse than AIDS will soon appear.
32. The totality of the organism’s response under stress creates a pattern of symptomatology that is uniquely individual for that patient. According to this principle, there cannot be a generalized treatment for a specific type of disorder.
Specific stressors like bacteria, microbes, viruses, etc., bring about gross reactions (disease symptoms) that on a superficial level look quite similar in everyone. Yet looking closer at each person’s symptomatology we perceive individualized reactions in different organisms that signify the individual response to stress. If the same treatment is given to everyone it will probably be to the detriment of the organism, which will have to face not only the disease but also the chemicals used to counteract the disease.
In established medicine, there may be talk about the need for a holistic approach in treating patients, but in actual practice the exact opposite occurs—the same medicine is prescribed for every patient with a specific disease.
In England, physicians established the Holistic British Medical Association to persuade people about their sincerity and beliefs in these principles.
It seems that orthodox medical people realize that the precepts of alternative medicine are correct. They acknowledge that treatment should address the whole individual in his mental, emotional and physical totality rather than only his local, physical manifestations. When it comes to actual practice, however, they frequently have no other option but to give the official treatment specific for a disease. The conventional type of treatment is supported and maintained by research groups and promoted by certain pharmaceutical companies with interests in mind.