Books

A New Model For Health And Disease – Page 31

PRELIMINARY IDEAS
Before presenting my proposed Model for Health and Disease, certain clarifications of some basic ideas promoted in this treatise may be necessary. It is for this reason I state, from the very beginning, that in this Model the states of health and disease are considered to be intricately interrelated, and our old concept of disease as a separate and distinct entity should be completely abandoned.
This idea has been hinted at by professors Manu Kothari and Lopa Mehta, who write, "Medicine has not been able to define what constitutes the normal, be it blood sugar or blood pressure… the differences between the ‘normal’ and the ‘abnormal’ are not that between black and white but that between shades of grey, with no dividing line anywhere."1
Toon writes in the Journal of Medical Ethics of December 1981, "The use of terms ‘disease’ and ‘diseases’ has come under increasing scrutiny in recent years… Medicine is leaving behind the idea of’specific diseases caused by specific agents’, if indeed it was ever held."
As Romano also states, "Health and disease are not static entities but are phases of life…." 2
From such an understanding, we may be talking about "differential health states" rather than distinct, separate states of health and disease. What is meant here is that in the interim from the state of absolute health to the state of near death, there are numerous modifications or substates of health that at certain points in time result in concrete pathology with definite symptomatology. We have all agreed to label these pathological conditions with a specific name, and thus the nomenclature of medicine has developed. Medical doctors will not accept that an individual is suffering from a specific disease unless they discover specific symptomatology which corresponds to their system of nomenclature.