Books

A New Model For Health And Disease – Page 29

drugs are released and become the new treatment of choice as a result of the intimations of their suitability unveiled by isolated research studies. These findings do not have to comply with any laws of nature. In fact, by ignoring such laws the individual researcher can easily transgress them without guilt or fear of penalty. The penalty is often exacted much later from the patient who must bear the consequences of the new drug’s effects.
In Silverman’s book Pills, Profits and Politics, we find an enlightening passage from testimony given by Dr. Dale Console, a former research director for a large pharmaceutical company, before a Senate committee. He said that:
"With many of these products, it is clear while they are on the drawing board that they promise no utility. They promise sales. It is not a question of pursuing them because something may come of it… They are pursued simply because there is profit in it… Since so much depends on novelty, drugs change like women’s hemlines, and rapid obsolescence is simply a sign of motion, not progress. With a little luck, proper timing, and a good promotion program, any bag of asafoetida with a unique chemical side-chain can be made to look like a wonder drug. The illusion may not last, but it frequently lasts long enough. By the time the doctor learns what the company knew in the beginning, the company has two new products to take the place of the old one…The pharmaceutical industry is unique in that it can make exploitation appear a noble purpose."1
Usually what happened was that the researcher’s assumptions about the drug remained valid only until it was found that either the drug was a real disaster or that in the long run its side effects were worse than the disease it was originally supposed to cure.
"In the United States alone, some 1,500,000 of the 30,000,000 patients hospitalized annually are admitted because of adverse reactions to drugs. In some hospitals, as high as 20% of the patients are admitted because of drug-induced disease, and during the one-year period beginning July 1, 1965, at the Montreal General Hospital 25% of the deaths on the public medical service were the result of adverse drug reactions."2
"At least two out of every five patients receiving drugs from their doctors suffer from side effects," 3A and "one in every twelve admissions to hospitals is caused by the side effects of treatment."5
I do not deny that all this "frantic" research has provided us with interesting insights into the mode of functioning of the human body, but it has managed to produce neither a thoroughly safe drug nor a drug which can cure without side effects.